<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critical Commentary is Not Bad Faith Use of Troubled Teen Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defendmydomain.com/critical-commentary-is-not-bad-faith-use-of-troubled-teen-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defendmydomain.com/critical-commentary-is-not-bad-faith-use-of-troubled-teen-site/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Dispute Attorneys, UDRP, Cybersquatting &#38; Intellectual Property Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:22:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: McHugh-Roohr</title>
		<link>http://www.defendmydomain.com/critical-commentary-is-not-bad-faith-use-of-troubled-teen-site/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>McHugh-Roohr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defendmydomain.com/?p=77#comment-940</guid>
		<description>What is Scheff&#039;s deal?  Her story claims that she was libeled by some sort of internet firestorm.  Except that now she seems to own and operate a whole mess of websites, many of them slandering one Carey Block (http://careybock.blogspot.com/, for example).  Is she waco or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is Scheff&#8217;s deal?  Her story claims that she was libeled by some sort of internet firestorm.  Except that now she seems to own and operate a whole mess of websites, many of them slandering one Carey Block (<a href="http://careybock.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://careybock.blogspot.com/</a>, for example).  Is she waco or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.defendmydomain.com/critical-commentary-is-not-bad-faith-use-of-troubled-teen-site/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defendmydomain.com/?p=77#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Links to the complaint, response, and annexes can be found here:
http://www.fornits.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=9&amp;t=25919#p316132</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links to the complaint, response, and annexes can be found here:<br />
<a href="http://www.fornits.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=9&amp;t=25919#p316132" rel="nofollow">http://www.fornits.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=9&amp;t=25919#p316132</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.defendmydomain.com/critical-commentary-is-not-bad-faith-use-of-troubled-teen-site/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defendmydomain.com/?p=77#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Hi. I&#039;m the respondant in this case (I represented myself).  I&#039;d be glad to field any questions about the case in this matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I&#8217;m the respondant in this case (I represented myself).  I&#8217;d be glad to field any questions about the case in this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
